So, here’s a sad statistic: California is dead last in the union in terms of angler participation in recreational fishing and yet has the second highest fishing license fees (only behind Washington State).
Is the decline in anglers because of the high costs of the licenses? Or is it the whole “pay more, get less” scenario in which California anglers simply don’t feel they are getting the enough bang for their buck? Or is it something else entirely?
Use the comments section to let us know what you think…
You can read more about this story HERE