(NOTE: I’m getting hit up with lots of questions this year about the smolt acclimation project that’s happening in the Sacramento River basin this spring, so I thought I’d repost this to give you some inside info).
You have no doubt heard about how California and the Feds, in response to extreme drought conditions in the Central Valley, are going to truck and net pen rear 30 million Chinook salmon smolt this spring. The first loads of small salmon were delivered to Rio Vista and released into the Sacramento River on Monday, March 24 and the project will continue into May.
I’m a huge supporter of this and figured I’d give you a little background…
Out-migrating hatchery Chinook salmon smolt from California’s Central Valley rivers have to navigate a seemingly impossible list of hazards that include massive water diversions, predators at every turn, poor water quality and temperatures that are often 70 degrees and higher. In a low water year like this, the trip is exponentially more lethal.
To help increase the odds of the little salmon’s survival, the California Department of Fish & Wildlife has been engaged in trucking the fish to locations in the lower Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta and upper San Francisco Bay for decades. The ride down Interstates 5 and 80 from the hatcheries on the Feather, Mokelumne and American rivers has given the fish a fighting chance but the feds, who operate Coleman National Fish Hatchery on the Sacramento River, have been more concerned with straying than salmon survival and have not participated. This year, however, the Golden Gate Salmon Association presented compelling evidence that the loss of salmon dumped directly into the river would be catastrophic and the feds finally agreed.
But simply trucking the salmon doesn’t ensure their survival — dumping the smolt directly into the water (like planted trout) made it so that predators like striped bass, sea lions, terns, seagulls, cormorants, etc. had plenty of food to eat. It was pure carnage at the release sites as the dazed fish suffered heavy losses immediately after leaving the trucks.
Fishery Foundation of California, which 20 years ago saw a better way…
According to the Foundation’s Executive Director, Trevor Kennedy, the FFC funded the area’s first net pen acclimation pilot study. They found that the net pens worked…big time. In fact, surveys showed that survival rates to the ocean for Chinook acclimated in the pens were 400% higher than those simply dumped straight into the river.
Think about that for a second…four hundred percent better survival! When you’re talking about that kind of improved survival for the tens of millions of fish released, you can see what a profound impact such a simple project can have!
After that, the project got the green light to go full bore and the numbers are impressive. The amount of fish that are released via the net pens varies annually, but Kennedy says that his outfit typically does 60 to 70 percent of the State’s Chinook…and are doing all of them in 2014!
Initially, the funding came from mitigation money from the water contractors for the zillions of smolt they sucked up in their pumps. Then, money for the project came from the Commercial Salmon Trollers. Kennedy said that for the past 6 years, the funding has come from Bay-Delta Fishery Enhancement Stamp. Unfortunately, future sources for this program are unclear…but it obviously needs to be continued!
The downside is the DFW and Feds would prefer to release fish in the river instead. They have this huge concern about salmon straying into the “wrong” systems. But, come on folks…in the Central Valley, which has been so altered by man, there’s nothing natural left. In this day and age, a live salmon in a river is a good salmon…regardless of origin.
Mike G says
Like when a kid rides the bus to school and can’t find his way home……but the ones who walk to school can.
JD says
Yes Mike G, however these kids are walking to school in the equivalent of Mogadishu
Terry Tarp says
JD
Very informative story. Thanks. But I am unaware of any diversions remaining on the Sacramento river below Colman Hatchery. The Red Bluff diversions dam has been placed in a state of non- op. My question is what would have these smolt (and all other native fish ) have done in a totaly natural setting. Without the dams in place these streams and rivers would be have dried up or would be warmer than bath water (as in year of old). Are you aware of any documentation that shows how these fish survived prior to humans say the water temp. must be just so? I agree we need to do our part to keep this wonderful fishery going but I think we need to inform folks as to what is happening to these fish offshore. Many other countries have no limit on fish harvest, or do not enforce these limit.
JD says
Terry,
Historically, you are correct, the valley rivers were low and warm during the summer and fall…but most of our Chinook in those days were spring run, not fall fish.
steelietom says
JD….sad that it’s come to this…trucking salmon smolts to a release point to increase thier survival rate….but, as history points out, it’s been coming on for eons….California’s unending thirst for water, the failure to realize that California is, as a rule, an arid climate state, and the unwillingness of our state government to validate the stocks of Salmon and Steelhead as vital parts of the California economy….as I said previously, the fish may not mean a hell of a lot to the corporate farmers and the communitiies that rely on those farms, but the fish do mean as much (or more) to those of us that care about, and rely on them, for food, work and an escape from the doldrums of the work-a-day life we lead.
Jeremiah says
It’s just too bad that the Coleman fish hatchery already released all of their late Fall smolts into Battle Creek. The late Fall fish are my favorite to target. Their returns were horrible this year and it appears will continue to be horrible for the next 3 years. Too bad the Feds didn’t pull their heads out a few months earlier.
Brian Kreb says
Ummm…. JD “nothing natural left is a bit of an overstatement.” Deer, Mill, Antelope,Cottonwood (Beegum) and somewhat Butte creek are very natural and intact systems. Straying is always going to be a concern, hatcheries can’t do it all. What about the natural predators that normally have a solid amount of fish to take during the migration periods? What shall be their fate during this already challenging year for native wildlife? I am all for trucking some too the majority of hatchery fish, but I think that there should be some additional releases for studies and for predator functionality. I wish I had time to do some RMIS studies, hopefully PSMFC is on top of it.
Gary Klement says
What needs to be studied are things like how all the pesticides used affect smolt survival.